One to Dig To Your Heart
The Armadillo
A lot of people seem to have misconceptions of the armadillo. While I am one person that gleefully welcomes them to migrate further north to my fair state, other people seem to think of them as more of a pest. They have been found as far as Illinois, so it’s only a matter of time until I can adopt one from the wild myself.
Speaking of the wild, they are only native to the Americas. There is a lot of folklore about these cute little fellas, but stories like those do not interest me. I could rattle on for pages about the false tales of misunderstood animals, one especially that of the armadillo. As far as science goes, these guys are quite the handful.
The nine-banded armadillo is the one species out of the many that might be the most interesting to refer specifically. Not only are armadillos the one of few non-human animals that can be infected with leprosy, but the nine-banded armadillo gives birth to four genetically identical quadruplets in each litter. There are very, very few species in the world that are known to possess this unique reproductive ability.
Speaking of ability, the armadillo doesn’t fall short of impressing would be skeptics of how lazy they may perceive the beast. A motorist may drive across a road and see a dead armadillo lying on the side. The immediate conclusion would be to think that it was hit by a car by darting into traffic, but how exactly was it struck? Typically by the fender.
Armadillos can jump rather high for looking so stubby and heavy. There are other animals in the world that give very odd instinctual reactions to being startled such as the genetically engineered fainting goats who go into temporary paralysis if given a good scare. It is thought that the fainting goat experiences no pain, but other animals are not as fortunate.
The armadillo will leap up in the air from a non-moving standing position high enough to be struck by the fender of an automobile. Imagine a car on the road driving and there is an animal in the way. The immediate horn blast scares the poor creature into a leap that places it directly in front of the car. It may be sad, but it is an impressive jumping feat nonetheless.
Other amazing abilities that other species of armadillo possess is the ability to inflate itself with air enough to swim across bodies of water and, quite the opposite, remain underwater for up to six minutes. There is one type that actually rolls up into a ball for defense like the common woodlouse. Though, I would imagine the armadillo has the clear advantage over which has the best defense capability.
Indeed, they are only known to be in the Americas, but what about fossil records? Well, one fossil record found in South America compares the size of the ancient armadillo to that of a car. Ridiculous to think about if it could roll itself into a ball and travel like when all the aliens in Critters 2 combined to form a ball of flesh eating terror. Well, except this guy would crush full sized sedans.
There exist so many species of armadillo, from cute and little to big and hairy. While I will not get into specifics about each and every one, just know that I would enjoy very much so to have one as a pet roaming my home. Of course, one that would not have the instinct to burrow around the basement. I can only imagine what linoleum would do to a set of claws.
In Apple We Antitrust
An apparent leak has been revealed that Microsoft will be shipping Windows 7 without Internet Explorer already bundled. While it is not the first time we’ve seen Microsoft hit with anti-trust lawsuits recently, many can only imagine why no one complains about Apple bundling all of their applications by default without alternatives out of the box.
One announcement from WWDC 2009 is that Snow Leopard is only $29 to upgrade from Leopard. That’s good news, but remember that the initial Mac OS X public beta was $29.95 and only lasted a little over half a year. As for Microsoft, we can download Windows Server 2008 R2 Release Candidate, based on the NT 7.0 kernel, and the Windows Server 2008 trial is good for 60 days. Also, Windows 7 has been out for several months now, with official and unofficial releases, for a long haul beta.
The $30 beta for Mac OS X did apply a discount for Cheetah, but was lacking in almost all features, and was rather unstable. Things did not improve for some time after the initial launch of OS X. Not only did the community pay for a beta, but they also paid for a very unfinished, featureless, and buggy operating system for the first retail release of OS X 10.0. They paid to stare at the Aqua UI. The Apple community can say what they want about Windows not being the best out of the box, but it took a couple of years for OS X to achieve usability.
Plenty of people would have became rabid if they could have only used the new Windows 7 toolbar with Jump Lists for 6 months without any real applications, DVD support, or much of any productivity software available, let alone that they received the beta for free. What would happen to Windows 7s sales if it took two years to become useful? Also, people were upset about backwards compatibility with Vista, but what of OS X Leopard/Snow Leopard and Classic? No more native OS 9 support.
I remember when Windows XP first came out. I remember the criticism about exploits, revolving door infections, and shoddy performance. After Service Pack 2 was released, everything then seemed stable enough. The same goes for Vista SP1, but what about Windows 7? There are several reports about glitches and other problems, but this is a public beta from Microsoft for a brand new operating system. No one will see a public beta, or free if “available” in beta, for Snow Leopard because everyone is already using Snow Leopard as Leopard or Tiger. It’s still OS X.
I have and still do give OS X a chance. I have had Mac OS X Tiger for the longest time and doubt I will ever upgrade to further service packs released by Apple. I cannot justify paying for a service pack for an operating system older then Windows XP that has had 5 retail service packs and a sixth on the way! WinXP had 3 SPs and was pretty solid by the second. While Microsoft didn’t focus heavily on themes, the end user can tweak their Windows desktop environment to make it unique.
It bothers me when I see blind iSheep flocking to the next “big” announcement in hopes it matches the rumors, but no keynote ever does. What is really bothersome is how the slightly positive announcements are given the most attention instead of the elephant in the room, such as a new line of expensive MacBook Pros without a removable battery. Apple can be just as greedy, if not more, as Microsoft and guilty of using guerrilla tactics equal to those committed by Microsoft.
I’d rather not wake up in the morning to see Safari secretly installed and automatically assigned as my default browser again. I uninstalled Apple software on my Windows PC, especially the disappointing Safari 4 release for Windows missing the delightful tab-process feature to kill tabs, which is featured in Chrome. Also, Chrome 2 appears has already “stolen the crown” that Apple gave itself, but was more of a pat on the back.
Mac OS X is a decent proprietary operating system with limited hardware configuration and software support, but Apple is the real culprit here with the misdirection, exaggerations, unnecessary mudslinging, and leaving loyal fans wondering if they are ever thought of in think tanks. I would imagine only true Apple fans can wait out the storm of bad ideas and implementations, but what would be considered the limit? Vista drew a great deal of fire, but when Snow Leopard drops, few will complain that they are paying for only a feature-lite service pack for OS X.
Digitus Medius to Consumerist Masochist
It’s official: Apple and AT&T gave the middle finger to their loyal existing customers this week. There isn’t much to say in regards to the reason why it’s a big middle finger, but it’s more of a question as to why should everyone care so much. No one really expects AT&T and Apple to give loyal customers deep discounts over new customers, that’s the way of the business world.
So, the new iPhone hardware will be hundreds of dollars more for existing customers to upgrade their phone. That’s fine. There are dozens of examples where this kind of new-customer-first policy takes place. One that comes to mind is a video store. Everyone has seen the big bold letters advertising 50% off rentals for 30 days to all new customers, but what about the veteran who has rented over 2,000 titles at New Release wall 5-day rental prices?
I could give more examples, but I’m sure everyone will immediately relate this behavior to many other companies. It’s nothing new, it’s just business. Big Tabacco doesn’t care about the black lunged, existing smokers, they want the new and healthy. The difference between other companies and AT&T/Apple is that there is a fine contract between the consumer and a fancy new gadget that will be a quarter of the price after ten weeks.
The biggest insult is that AT&T could give their iPhone customers MMS, and should have before 3.0, but they refused all this time and will possibly push it out over the summer. They’ll charge for tethering, possibly adding it onto the unlimited data plan, causing the already pricey data plan to become quite a monthly monster.
The WWDC 2009 keynote announcements have stuffed my RSS feeds with enough rehashed news of rabid fanboyism and upset elitists in regards to the same three announcements for me to care. I noticed Apple fans are different. Apparently, no one can be a true Apple fan without appreciating the fact that they will get shat on often.
At least with Microsoft, there is no mystery. We knew Vista wasn’t great, but people bought it anyway. There went all our “ancient” 2005 software and printers that have been in the family for generations. We knew all of this before upgrading to Vista and many have regretted it ever since, but the fact remains that consumers did not have to buy into Vista and even the techie novice knew about many flaws beforehand.
While it may not be quality on release, what operating system is without a few updates to harden? Windows XP wasn’t quite ready until Service Pack 2, but Microsoft didn’t charge each end user to apply the update. Should Microsoft follow Apple in their footsteps and put a price on Windows 7 Service Pack 1? Chaos would erupt. Satan himself would rise from the depths of hell to congratulate Ballmer on a job well done.
Speaking of which, Apple loves to take cheap shots stating that Windows 7 is nothing but a polished Windows Vista, but how can a company that charges for service packs for the same exact operating system over a period of eight years have any room to talk about a rival company charging for a completely new operating system? What a double standard!
Windows 7 is not Vista 2.0. I’ve been using Windows 7 since January and I’ve been thoroughly impressed by it. Microsoft giving Windows 7 Home Premium upgrades for $49.99 for Vista owners is also a great incentive. While Snow Leopard upgrades are to be sold for only $29.99, I still cannot justify a service pack update going retail for just a few system enhancements.
Should we really have to pay any money to be able to give our desktop more of a brushed metal theme or to take it away in a future update with something more unified? What about a smaller footprint for the operating system? Ridiculous.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mean to blast Mac OS X. Sure, OS X has come a long way, but I’d rather use another open source Unix-like environment that allows Wine, which is fantastic software. Wine is rather experimental with OS X currently, but Apple could really help out the community, and possibly themselves, by embracing the Windows emulation software.
Why buy a completely different Office version specifically for the Mac when everyone already has pirated Office 2003 for Windows? Imagine the Switch commercials!
Speaking of switching, Apple is beginning to look like a pack of goons without some puppet CEO to hold up shiny new products. How will Apple be without Jobs? That’s easy, look at what they were before Jobs. A history of messy hardware choices and poor customer support. Without Jobs on the job, they have already made some potential costly mistakes at WWDC 2009.
The new MacBook line will be cheaper, powerful, but without a removable battery. That’s pretty bad, so much for executive professionals. Just keep it charging the entire time the MacBook Pro is in use! It’s healthy for the battery.* Also, the little bit about ExpressCard being removed seems a mystery to some, but not to me. Apple has always tried to adopt different technologies, switch it up, and, at times, tackle completely new connections that become unique to their systems.
While it is nice to attempt to be revolutionary and take a different road at certain forks in difficult technological decisions, I think Apple, right now, said silently, “I’ve made a huge mistake.”
Another slap in the face is, of course, the “new” iPhones looking exactly like the “classic” 3G model. I can see the fanboys getting frustrated now! “It’s not iPhone3G! It’s iPhone3GS! Gawd!” Everyone else can imagine that, I’m sure. Though, the only real difference is video recording and that’s too little, too late for the cost of the 3GS.
As for the mud slinging, it won’t end. Without Microsoft and Apple feuding over marketshare, I shudder to think about an alternate universe where we would be right now in terms of home computers. Would they would even be as affordable or easily obtainable as they are now? To think that only certain organizations could afford, or donated, computers, such as libraries and schools. This is a terrible thought, but enough of future-speak and what-if scenarios.
Gadgetry like the iPhone3GS is not special, nothing to clamor over or freak out globally on every tech blog on the internet. There are few apps to truly want and the hardware upgrades just don’t seem worth the cash to upgrade. Too expensive, but still want it? Wait a few weeks and buy three for the price it cost for one during the release weekend.
* – It’s not.
English